Sugar-Salem Joint School District 322
Sugar-Salem Joint School District 322 is located in east Idaho. Sugar-Salem Joint School District 322 has 173.32 square miles of land area and 1.35 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Sugar-Salem Joint School District 322 population is 5,157. Sugar-Salem Joint School District 322 median household income is $57,527 in 2010-2014. Sugar-Salem Joint School District 322 median house value is $182,900 in 2010-2014. On average, Sugar-Salem Joint School District 322 is much better than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Sugar-Salem Joint School District 322 Map, Border, and Nearby Locations
105 West Center St
Sugar City ID, 83448, Madison County
Phone: 208-356-8802
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 1,582 | 1,520 | 1,464 | 1,465 | 1,467 | 1,438 | 1,392 |
English Language Learner Students: | 37 | 52 | 46 | 43 | 50 | 45 | 30 |
Total Teachers: | 79.02 | 78.19 | 79.86 | 91.98 | 79.18 | 77.10 | 75.60 |
Prekindergarten: | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Kindergarten: | 2.75 | 3.25 | 2.80 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.50 | 3.00 |
Elementary: | 33.16 | 34.49 | 33.60 | 42.37 | 38.49 | 38.20 | 35.60 |
Secondary: | 42.11 | 39.45 | 42.46 | 45.61 | 36.69 | 35.40 | 36.00 |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Total Other Staff: | 59.06 | 34.32 | 60.36 | 62.46 | 60.91 | 61.00 | 65.00 |
Instructional Aides: | 16.42 | 20.72 | 20.34 | 18.58 | 17.09 | 15.60 | 17.70 |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | NA | NA | 1.25 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.80 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 1.04 | 2.06 | 0.14 | 2.09 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.40 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | NA | 2.06 | 0.14 | 2.09 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.60 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 1.04 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.33 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 2.73 | 2.75 | 2.76 | 2.79 | 2.75 | 2.70 | 2.50 |
District Administrators: | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
District Administrative Support: | 0.00 | NA | 2.20 | 2.20 | 2.20 | 2.20 | 2.20 |
School Administrators: | 3.81 | 4.60 | 1.92 | 2.45 | 3.82 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
School Administrative Support: | 3.69 | 3.69 | 3.69 | 3.73 | 3.73 | 3.70 | 3.70 |
Student Support Services: | 29.37 | NA | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
Other Support Services: | NA | NA | 27.86 | 28.09 | 26.62 | 28.10 | 29.90 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 20.02 | 19.44 | 18.33 | 15.93 | 18.53 | 18.65 | 18.41 |
Schools
Central Elementary School | Prekindergarten to Grade 3 | 102 North Park St, Sugar City ID 83448 | |
Kershaw Intermediate School | Grade 4 to Grade 6 | 610 East 3rd North, Sugar City ID 83448 | |
Sugar-Salem High School | Grade 9 to Grade 12 | 1 Digger Dr, Sugar City ID 83448 | |
Sugar-Salem Junior High School | Grade 7 to Grade 8 | 10 North Cutler St, Sugar City ID 83448 | |
Valley View Alternative High | Grade 9 to Grade 12 | 1 Digger Dr, Sugar City ID 83448 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
ISAT Test | |||||
2008 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.8% | 68.8% |
2009 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 29.2% | 40.7% |
2010 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.4% | 71.5% |
2011 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.2% | 72.6% |
2012 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.2% | 76.6% |
2013 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.4% | 72.3% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.7% | 76.7% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 25% | 44% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.4% | 76.8% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 78.5% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.8% | 78% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.9% | 76.4% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 85.7% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 61.5% | 58.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 86.4% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.2% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 99.1% | 87.6% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 89.2% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 66.9% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 68.6% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 67.9% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.4% | 69.3% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.4% | 72.5% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 75.2% | 72.7% |
2009 | Language Usage | 11th Grade | % met std | 12.5% | 26% |
2011 | Language Usage | 11th Grade | % met std | 18.2% | 26.4% |
2012 | Language Usage | 11th Grade | % met std | 25% | 32.9% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 9.1% | 23% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 36.4% | 31.6% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 46.7% | 28.6% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 40% | 26.4% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 9.1% | 38.4% |
2008 | Language Usage | 3rd Grade | % met std | 63.9% | 70% |
2009 | Language Usage | 3rd Grade | % met std | 72.8% | 73.3% |
2010 | Language Usage | 3rd Grade | % met std | 70.5% | 73.1% |
2011 | Language Usage | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75% | 73.7% |
2012 | Language Usage | 3rd Grade | % met std | 70% | 74.6% |
2013 | Language Usage | 3rd Grade | % met std | 79.1% | 72.9% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.1% | 87.5% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.3% | 86.6% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 87.7% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 88.6% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 88.4% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95.3% | 89.7% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 82.7% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 86.8% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 88.9% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95% | 89.2% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 88.4% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 89.4% |
2008 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.8% | 77.6% |
2009 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.7% | 80.4% |
2010 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 81.9% |
2011 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 81.1% |
2012 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 84.8% |
2013 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.5% | 83.2% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.9% | 84.2% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 85.6% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 84.9% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 83.4% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 86.8% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 86.1% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.2% | 82.5% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 86.3% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 86.2% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 86.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 88.9% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.7% | 89.7% |
2008 | Language Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 75.2% | 74.2% |
2009 | Language Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.9% | 77.2% |
2010 | Language Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.2% | 77.2% |
2011 | Language Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 78.7% |
2012 | Language Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.5% | 79.4% |
2013 | Language Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 83% | 80.1% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.2% | 78% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.9% | 77.9% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 89% | 79.8% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 80.9% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 78.6% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.5% | 79.2% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 84.3% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 86.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 89% | 88% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 88.1% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.3% | 87.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.8% | 88.5% |
2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 72.3% | 60.1% |
2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 70.5% | 66.4% |
2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 69.5% | 64.9% |
2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.8% | 67.4% |
2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.8% | 69.3% |
2013 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.5% | 72.2% |
2008 | Language Usage | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 71.7% |
2009 | Language Usage | 6th Grade | % met std | 79.6% | 73.7% |
2010 | Language Usage | 6th Grade | % met std | 85% | 75.1% |
2011 | Language Usage | 6th Grade | % met std | 84.3% | 75.4% |
2012 | Language Usage | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 76.5% |
2013 | Language Usage | 6th Grade | % met std | 78.3% | 73.4% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 77.1% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 78.2% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 79.2% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 77.5% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 95.4% | 79% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.4% | 77.8% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 81.6% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 85.7% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 85.8% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93% | 88.4% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 89.5% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 86.7% |
2008 | Language Usage | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.7% | 69% |
2009 | Language Usage | 7th Grade | % met std | 75.9% | 71.3% |
2010 | Language Usage | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.9% | 73.5% |
2011 | Language Usage | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 73.5% |
2012 | Language Usage | 7th Grade | % met std | 83.5% | 74.2% |
2013 | Language Usage | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.5% | 74.6% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 74.8% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 83.5% | 75.2% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 78.3% | 75.3% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 89% | 74.5% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 75.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 77% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 79.6% | 80.7% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 85.3% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 87.4% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 87.7% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 95.8% | 90.8% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 88.3% |
2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 58.1% | 51% |
2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 58.6% | 55.8% |
2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 58.5% | 53.7% |
2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 62.1% | 57.2% |
2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 60.4% | 59.4% |
2013 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 66.1% | 56.8% |
2008 | Language Usage | 8th Grade | % met std | 78.5% | 66.6% |
2009 | Language Usage | 8th Grade | % met std | 82.5% | 71.5% |
2010 | Language Usage | 8th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 71.8% |
2011 | Language Usage | 8th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 71.2% |
2012 | Language Usage | 8th Grade | % met std | 84% | 72.8% |
2013 | Language Usage | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 74.8% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 78.6% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 78.4% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 91.8% | 79.9% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 79.5% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 78.8% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 79.8% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 88.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 96% | 91.4% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 91.3% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 97.3% | 92.6% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 98.4% | 92.3% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 97.6% | 93.8% |
2010 | Language Usage | 9th Grade | % met std | 74.8% | 63.3% |
2011 | Language Usage | 9th Grade | % met std | 72.4% | 62.8% |
2012 | Language Usage | 9th Grade | % met std | 82.5% | 66.1% |
2013 | Language Usage | 9th Grade | % met std | 72.3% | 62.4% |
2010 | Math | 9th Grade | % met std | 72.9% | 69.9% |
2011 | Math | 9th Grade | % met std | 82.9% | 69.5% |
2012 | Math | 9th Grade | % met std | 79.8% | 68.8% |
2013 | Math | 9th Grade | % met std | 77.7% | 66.6% |
2010 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 79.1% | 80.8% |
2011 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 81% |
2012 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 80.9% |
2013 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 82.3% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $9,076,000 | $6,199 | $10,140,000 | $6,922 | $10,168,000 | $6,931 | |||
Federal: | $1,217,000 | $831 | 13.4% | $1,363,000 | $930 | 13.4% | $2,075,000 | $1,414 | 20.4% |
State: | $6,661,000 | $4,550 | 73.4% | $7,278,000 | $4,968 | 71.8% | $6,834,000 | $4,658 | 67.2% |
Local: | $1,198,000 | $818 | 13.2% | $1,499,000 | $1,023 | 14.8% | $1,259,000 | $858 | 12.4% |
Total Expenditures: | $9,293,000 | $6,348 | $9,615,000 | $6,563 | $9,582,000 | $6,532 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $9,037,000 | $6,173 | $9,165,000 | $6,256 | $9,004,000 | $6,138 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $5,859,000 | $4,002 | 64.8% | $6,056,000 | $4,134 | 66.1% | $5,750,000 | $3,920 | 63.9% |
Student and Staff Support: | $385,000 | $263 | 4.3% | $414,000 | $283 | 4.5% | $442,000 | $301 | 4.9% |
Administration: | $911,000 | $622 | 10.1% | $928,000 | $633 | 10.1% | $933,000 | $636 | 10.4% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $1,882,000 | $1,286 | 20.8% | $1,767,000 | $1,206 | 19.3% | $1,879,000 | $1,281 | 20.9% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $203,000 | $139 | $376,000 | $257 | $505,000 | $344 | |||
Construction: | $135,000 | $92 | $348,000 | $238 | $449,000 | $306 | |||
Total Other: | $23,000 | $16 | $22,000 | $15 | $0 | $0 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $30,000 | $20 | $52,000 | $35 | $73,000 | $50 | |||
Total Salary: | $5,319,000 | $3,633 | $5,723,000 | $3,906 | $5,505,000 | $3,753 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $3,898,000 | $2,663 | 73.3% | $4,256,000 | $2,905 | 74.4% | $4,009,000 | $2,733 | 72.8% |
Other Salary: | $1,421,000 | $971 | 26.7% | $1,467,000 | $1,001 | 25.6% | $1,496,000 | $1,020 | 27.2% |
Total Benefit: | $1,971,000 | $1,346 | $1,960,000 | $1,338 | $1,850,000 | $1,261 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $1,440,000 | $984 | 73.1% | $1,454,000 | $992 | 74.2% | $1,354,000 | $923 | 73.2% |
Other Benefit: | $531,000 | $363 | 26.9% | $506,000 | $345 | 25.8% | $496,000 | $338 | 26.8% |
Teacher's Experience and Compensation
2007 | |
Teachers with Bachelor Degree: | 84.6% |
Teachers with Master or PhD Degree: | 15.4% |
Mean Number of Years of Teaching: | 15.0 years |
Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | 15.4% |
Teachers with 6-10 Years of Experience: | 15.4% |
Teachers with 11-20 Years of Experience: | 44.6% |
Teachers with 21-30 Years of Experience: | 20.0% |
Teachers with 31 Years of Experience or More: | 4.6% |
Mean Base Salary: | $40,183.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | $30,094.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 6-10 Years of Experience: | $33,689.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 11-20 Years of Experience: | $43,736.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 21-30 Years of Experience: | $43,950.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 31 Years of Experience or More: | $44,780.0 |
* Sugar-Salem Joint School District 322 was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.